An intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR model for student-employee selection in universities

M33

Doç. Dr. Gültekin Altuntaş
İstanbul Üniversitesi Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Fakültesi, Lojistik Anabilim Dalı

Dr. Bahadır Fatih Yıldırım
İstanbul Üniversitesi Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Fakültesi, Lojistik Anabilim Dalı

Doç. Dr. Ebru Demirci
İstanbul Üniversitesi Ulaştırma ve Lojistik Fakültesi, Lojistik Anabilim Dalı

Abstract

This study aims to propose an MCDM approach for a real case in a group decision-making environment where intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) VIKOR method with seven criteria developed and evaluated by a group of three scholars has been applied to nine candidates for a part time student employee selection problem in a state university from an emerging country with the highest rate of dropouts in 2019 mainly due to financial burdens associated with the higher education. It reveals that the supervisors advice is the most important criterion to be employed as a student to work part time while his/her competencies are the second most one. The criteria regarded as the lowest level of importance have been determined as his/her family/roommate(s) support and income level. Based on such criteria, the candidate of A1 is regarded as the most suitable one.

Keywords: Employee Selection, Intuitionistic Fuzzy, MCDM, Personnel Selection, Student Employment, VIKOR

Jel Sınıflandırma:

  • Abbas, G. (2019, March 02). Üniversiteyi terk eden sayısı neden artıyor? (Why do the number of university dropouts increase?) Retrieved July 03, 2020, from https://www.milliyet.com.tr/yazarlar/abbas–guclu/universiteyi–terk–eden–sayisi–neden–artiyor–2835795.
  • Abdel–Basset, M., Zhou, Y., Mohamed, M., & Chang, V. (2018). A group decision making framework based on neutrosophic VIKOR approach for e–government website evaluation. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34(6), 4213–4224.
  • Afshari, A., & Kowal, J. (2018). Decision–making methods for the selection of ICT project manager. SSRN, 18(4), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3118075.
  • Afshari, A.R., Anisseh, M., Shahraki, M. R., & Hooshyar, S. (2016), “PROMETHEE use in personnel selection”, ICTM, p. 124.
  • Afshari, R. A., Nikolić, M., & Cockalo, D. (2014). Applications of fuzzy decision making for personnel selection problem: A review. Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness (JEMC), 4(2), 68–77.
  • Aggarwal, R. (2013). Selection of IT personnel through hybrid multi–attribute AHP–FLP approach. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 2(6), 11–17.
  • Alguliyev, R. M. O., Alguliyev, R. M., & Mahmudova, R. S. (2015). Multicriteria personnel selection by the modified fuzzy VIKOR method. Scientific World Journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/612767.
  • Altuntas, G. & Yildirim, B. F. (Forthcoming). Logistics specialist selection with intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2020.10029471.
  • Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96.
  • Baert, S., Rotsaert, O., Verhaest, D., & Omey, E. (2016). Student employment and later labour market success: No evidence for higher employment chances. Kyklos, 69(3), 401–425.
  • Boran, F. E., Genc, S., & Akay, D. (2011). Personnel selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21(5), 493–503.
  • Cakir, E. (2016). Kısmi zamanlı olarak çalışacak öğrencilerin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi temelli VIKOR yöntemi ile belirlenmesi (The determination of part–time students using VIKOR method based on analytic hierarchy process). Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi (International Journal of Management Economics and Business), 12(29), 195–224.
  • Celikbilek, Y. (2018). A grey analytic hierarchy process approach to project manager selection. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(3), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM–04–2017–0102.
  • Cetin, E., & Icigen, E. (2017). Personnel selection based on step–wise weight assessment ratio analysis and multi–objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis methods. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering 11(11), 2709–2713.
  • Chen, T. Y. (2018). Remoteness index–based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis. Information Fusion, 41, 129–150.
  • Chu M.T., Shyu J., Tzeng G.H., & Khosla R., (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33 (4), 1011–1024.
  • CoHE – Council of Higher Education. (2020). Higher education statistics, Retrieved July 03, 2020, from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/.
  • Cooper, D., & Robertson, I. (1995). The psychology of personnel selection: A quality approach: Burns & Oates.
  • Dahooie, J., Beheshti Jazan Abadi, E., Vanaki, A. S., & Firoozfar, H. R. (2018). Competency–based IT personnel selection using a hybrid SWARA and ARAS–G methodology. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 28(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20713.
  • Demircioglu, M., & Tiyekli, E. (2019). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS for part–time student selection. Journal of the Cukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 28(2).
  • Efe, B. (2019). ERP software selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR method. In Multi–Criteria Decision–Making Models for Website Evaluation (pp. 121–137). IGI Global.
  • Erdem, M. B. (2016). A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process application in personnel selection in IT companies: A case study in a spin–off company. Acta Physica Polonica A, 130(1), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.130.331.
  • Goksu, A., & Kaya, S. E. (2014). Ranking of tourist destinations with multi–criteria decision making methods in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, 12(2), 91–103.
  • Gul, M., Ak, M. F., & Guneri, A. F. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR–based approach for safety risk assessment in mine industry. Journal of Safety Research, 69, 135–153.
  • Hansen, S. L., & Hoag, B. A. (2018). Promoting learning, career readiness, and leadership in student employment. New directions for student leadership, 2018(157), 85–99.
  • Hauschildt, K., Vögtle, E.M., Gwosc, C. (2018), Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe 2016 – 2018. Eurostudent VI synopsis of indicators. German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies.
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (1997). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. Chicago, IL: Irwin.
  • Hu, J., Pan, L., & Chen, X. (2017). An interval neutrosophic projection–based VIKOR method for selecting doctors. Cognitive Computation, 9(6), 801–816.
  • Huang, Y. H., Wei, G. W., & Wei, C. (2017). VIKOR method for interval neutrosophic multiple attribute group decision–making. Information, 8(4), 144.
  • Istanbul University. (2009). İstanbul Üniversitesi Kısmi Zamanlı Öğrenci Çalıştırma Yönergesi. (Directive to employ part – time students). Retrieved July 03, 2020, from http://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/FileHandler2.ashx?f=kismi–zamanli–calistirma–yonergesi.pdf.
  • Jasemi, M., & Ahmadi, E. (2017). A new fuzzy ELECTRE based multiple criteria method for personnel selection. Scientia Iranica, 25(2), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4435.
  • Ji, P., Zhang, H. Y., & Wang, J. Q. (2018). A projection–based TODIM method under multi–valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521–016–2436–z.
  • Kabak, M., Burmaoglu, S., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2012). A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3516–3525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.042.
  • Karabasevic, D., Kazimieras, E., Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G. I., & Brzakovic, M. (2018). An approach to personnel selection in the IT industry based on the EDAS method. Transformations in Business and Economics, 17(2), 54–65.
  • Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Urosevic, S., & Maksimovic, M. (2015). Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 20(2).
  • Kasraee, A. R., & Etemadi, A. R. (2018). Designing a model for selecting human resource through multi criterion decision–making method: evidence from Iran, 8(1), 1–8.
  • Kaynak, T., (2002), Human Resources Management, Istanbul, Turkey: Nobel Publishing,
  • Keskiner, E. (2017). Student employment among descendants of Turkish migrants in Amsterdam and Strasbourg. Journal of Education and Work, 30(3), 203–216.
  • Khan, M. S. A., Abdullah, S., Ali, A., & Amin, F. (2019). An extension of VIKOR method for multi–attribute decision–making under Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy setting. Granular Computing, 4(3), 421–434.
  • Khandekar, A. V., & Chakraborty, S. (2016). Personnel selection using fuzzy axiomatic design principles. Business: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 251–260.
  • Korkmaz, O. (2019) Personnel selection method based on TOPSIS multi–criteria decision making. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 23: 1–16.
  • Krishankumar, R., Premaladha, J., Ravichandran, K. S., Sekar, K. R., Manikandan, R., & Gao, X. Z. (2020). A novel extension to VIKOR method under intuitionistic fuzzy context for solving personnel selection problem. Soft Computing, 24(2), 1063–1081.
  • Kulik, C. T., Roberson, L., & Perry, E. L. (2007). The multiple–category problem: Category activation and inhibition in the hiring process. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 529–548.
  • Kusumawardani, R. P., & Agintiara, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS method for decision making in human resource manager selection process. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.173.
  • Kutlu Gundogdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2019). A novel VIKOR method using spherical fuzzy sets and its application to warehouse site selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, (Preprint), 1–15.
  • Kutlu Gundogdu, F., Kahraman, C., & Karasan, A. (2019, July). Spherical fuzzy VIKOR method and its application to waste management. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 997–1005). Springer, Cham.
  • Liang, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., & Jamaldeen, A. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking website quality of Ghanaian banking industry. Applied Soft Computing, 78, 583–594.
  • Liao, H., & Xu, Z. (2013). A VIKOR–based method for hesitant fuzzy multi–criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 12(4), 373–392.
  • Liu, P., & Zhang, L. (2017). An extended multiple criteria decision making method based on neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(6), 4403–4413.
  • Meksavang, P., Shi, H., Lin, S. M., & Liu, H. C. (2019). An extended picture fuzzy VIKOR approach for sustainable supplier management and its application in the beef industry. Symmetry, 11(4), 468.
  • Miller, A. C. S. (2019). Training for the Future: College Student Employee Persistence through Engagement and Development (Doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne).
  • MoE – Ministry of Education. (2020), National education statistics. Retrieved July 03, 2020, from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=361.
  • MoTaF – Ministry of Treasury and Finance. (2020). Economic indicators. Retrieved July 03, 2020, from https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2020/07/aylikekonomikgosterge03072020.pdf.
  • Mounsey, R., Vandehey, M., & Diekhoff, G. (2013). Working and non–working university students: Anxiety, depression, and grade point average. College Student Journal, 47(2), 379–389.
  • Narayanamoorthy, S., Geetha, S., Rakkiyappan, R., & Joo, Y. H. (2019). Interval–valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy entropy based VIKOR method for industrial robots selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 28–37.
  • Neyt, B., Omey, E., Verhaest, D., & Baert, S. (2019). Does student work really affect educational outcomes? A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(3), 896–921.
  • Opricovic, S. (2009). A compromise solution in water resources planning. Water resources management, 23(8), 1549.
  • Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12983–12990.
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). The compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
  • Parkouhi, S. V., & Ghadikolaei, A. S. (2017). A resilience approach for supplier selection: Using fuzzy analytic network process and grey VIKOR techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 431–451.
  • Ployhart, E. R., Schmitt, N. and Tippins, T. N. (2017). Solving the supreme problem: 100 Years of selection and recruitment at The Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 291–304.
  • Qin, J., Liu, X., & Pedrycz, W. (2015). An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type–2 fuzzy environment. Knowledge–Based Systems, 86, 116–130.
  • Riggert, S. C., Boyle, M., Petrosko, J. M., Ash, D., & Rude–Parkins, C. (2006). Student employment and higher education: Empiricism and contradiction. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 63–92.
  • Robertson, I. T., & Smith, M. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of occupational and Organizational psychology, 74(4), 441–472.
  • Roshchin, S., & Rudakov, V. (2017). Patterns of student employment in Russia. Journal of Education and Work, 30(3), 314–338.
  • Rostamzadeh, R., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., & Sabaghi, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecological Indicators, 49, 188–203.
  • Sadatrasool, M., Bozorgi–Amiri, A., & Yousefi–Babadi, A. (2016). Project manager selection based on project manager competency model: PCA–MCDM approach. Journal of Project Management, 1(10), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.004
  • Samanlioglu, F., Taskaya, Y. E., Gulen, U. C., & Cokcan, O. (2018). A fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS–based group decision–making approach to IT personnel selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(5), 1576–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815–018–0474–7.
  • Sang, X., Liu, X., & Qin, J. (2015). An analytical solution to fuzzy TOPSIS and its application in personnel selection for knowledge–intensive enterprise. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 30, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.002.
  • Schmitt, N., Chan, D., & Chan, E. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Sage.
  • Senel, B., Senel, M., & Aydemir, G. (2017). Multi criteria decision making method TOPSIS with personnel selection. International Refereed Journal of Researches on Economics Management, 4(13), 19–70.
  • Shinde, R., & Kaynak, D. (2016). Analysis of the Turkish Education System: A System Dynamics Approach on Dropouts and Deficiencies in Job Market. 한국시스템다이내믹스 연구, 17(4), 157–183.
  • Simón, H., Díaz, J. M. C., & Costa, J. L. C. (2017). Analysis of university student employment and its impact on academic performance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(2), 281–306.
  • Soner, O., Celik, E., & Akyuz, E. (2017). Application of AHP and VIKOR methods under interval type 2 fuzzy environment in maritime transportation. Ocean Engineering, 129, 107–116.
  • Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B., & Karabasevic, D. (2015). Selection of candidates in the process of recruitment and selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS methods. Quaestus, 7, 53–64.
  • TurkStat – Turkish Statistical Institute. (2019a). Population of provinces by years of 2000 – 2019, Address Based Population Registration System (ABPRS). Retrieved July 03, 2020, from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=1590.
  • TurkStat – Turkish Statistical Institute. (2019b). The results of Address Based Population Registration System (ABPRS) for the years of 2007 – 2019. Retrieved July 03, 2020, from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=1339.
  • TurkStat – Turkish Statistical Institute. (2020) Consumer price index numbers, Retrieved July 03, 2020, from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=650.
  • Urosevic, S., Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., & Maksimovic, M. (2017). An approach to personnel selection in the tourism industry based on the SWARA and the WASPAS methods. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 51(1), 75–88.
  • Wang, J., Wei, G., & Lu, M. (2018a). An extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making with triangular fuzzy neutrosophic numbers. Symmetry, 10(10), 497.
  • Wang, L., Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q., & Li, L. (2018b). Picture fuzzy normalized projection–based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 216–226.
  • Wang, W. (2016). Cross–National Effectiveness of Cognitive/Affective, Demographic, and Skills Selection Criteria (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Wei, G., Wang, J., Lu, J., Wu, J., Wei, C., Alsaadi, F. E., & Hayat, T. (2019). VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making under 2–tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment. Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–24.
  • Wu, L., Gao, H., & Wei, C. (2019). VIKOR method for financing risk assessment of rural tourism projects under interval–valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, (Preprint), 1–8.
  • Wu, Z., Xu, J., Jiang, X., & Zhong, L. (2019). Two MAGDM models based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with possibility distributions: VIKOR and TOPSIS. Information Sciences, 473, 101–120.
  • Xia, M., & Xu, Z. (2012). Entropy/cross entropy–based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Information Fusion, 13(1), 31–47.
  • Xu, Z. (2007a). Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 6(2), 109–121.
  • Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zolfani, S. H. (2017). Integrated QFD–MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740.
  • Yazdani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2016). New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 1097–1113.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
  • Zhao, J., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., & Wu, S. M. (2017). An extended VIKOR method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets and combination weights for supplier selection. Symmetry, 9(9), 169.

    Altuntaş, G., Yıldırım, B. F., Demirci, E. (2021). "An intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR model for student-employee selection in universities". International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 0 (0), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2021.10034714